An important attribute of
any successful combat aircraft is often said to be its suitability for
development.
A capacity for modification or adaptation to take larger and more
powerful engines, heavier armament and other operational equipment as
such becomes available, without necessitating an extensive re-design of
fundamental components and consequent major retooling may well be of
incalculable value. Germany’s Messerschmitt Bf 109 single-seat
fighter was an excellent example of such development suitability. In its
fina1 production models it differed radically from its origina1
prototype of 1935, but the changes were introduced gradually, and thus
the flow of new machines to the squadrons was never stemmed.
It has been claimed that the Bf 109 served as a proto-type for
international fighter construction; it has been referred to as the
progenitor of the high-powered, single-seat, low-wing monoplane fighter.
In fact it made its début but a few weeks before Britain’s Hawker
Hurricane, and a mere six months before its major wartime antagonist,
the Supermarine Spitfire, but it attained service status considerably
earlier than either one of its contemporaries, and it was subsequently to claim the distinction of being produced in larger numbers than any
other combat aircraft of the Second World War. During its infancy it
appeared to lack the hallmark of the thoroughbred, but success came with
maturity for, despite severa1 widely publicised shortcomings, the Bf 109
was a highly successful combat aeroplane.
The Bf 109 was conceived in the summer of 1934, when the German Air
Ministry issued a requirement far a single-seat interceptor fighter
monoplane with which to replace the obsolescent Heinkel
He 51 and Arado
Ar 65 biplanes then serving the Luftwaffer’s fighter elements. Four
manufacturers were awarded prototype development contracts: the Arado
Flugzeugwerke produced the Ar 8OV1, the Bayerische Flupzeugwerke produced
the Bf 109V1, the Ernst Heinkel A.G. produced the He 112V1, and the
Focke-Wulf Flugzeugbau produced the Fw 159Vl. Of these, the Focke-Wulf
fighter employed the new and relatively untried Junkers Jumo 210A
engine which delivered 610 h.p. for take-off, and the others used the most
powerful and reliable engine available at that time, the
Rolls-Royce Kestrel V which provided 695 h.p. for take-off.
Trials with the four fighter prototypes, held at
Travemfinde during late October 1935, left no doubt as to the
superiority of the Bayerische Flugzeugwerke and Ernst Heinkel products.
Both machines were low-wing, all-meta1 aircraft with retractable
under-carriages, and their performances were closely comparable.
The He
112Vl possessed the more pleasing contours, and its better streamlined form compensated for its
heavier structure. Its undercarriage had a wider track than that of the Bf 109V1, and
it did not possess the latter’s enclosed cockpit which was looked upon
initially with considerable distrust. Some surprise was,
therefore,
evinced when the Bf 109 was selected as the winner of the contest, and
an order for ten machines placed with the Bayerische Flugzeugwerke.
Professor Willy Messerschmitt had joined the Bayerische Flugzeugwerke in 1927, and at the end of 1933
was joined by Dipl. Eng. W. Rethel, formerly of Arado. Headed by
Messerschmitt and aided by Rethel, the design team strove to achieve
optimum performance by designing the smallest possible airframe that
could accommodate the most powerful
aero engines at that time under development in Germany. The angular
lines of the fighter gave it an air of ruthless efficiency, perhaps in
keeping with its German origin, and although the wing loading of the prototype was less than 24 lb./sq. ft., the design team anticipated the higher
loadings to come, for among the new fighter’s innovations were
high-lift devices such as automatic leading-edge slots to give increased
aileron control near the stall, large slotted flaps and slotted
ailerons which depressed 10” when the flaps were fully lowered.
The
ground angle was steep in order to obtain the steepest practicable
incidence and, therefore, the highest lift coefficient when landing.
Powered by the 695 h.p. Rolls-Royce Kestrel V the Bf 109V1, bearing the factory number 758 and the civil registration D-IABI,
was completed in the summer of 1935 and flown in September. In October,
after the initial Right trials had been successfully concluded, the
machine was flown to the Rechlin experimenta1 establishment by test
pilot Knoetsch. Unfortunately, the undercarriage collapsed during the
landing at Rechlin, and the prototype suffered superficial damage.
Nevertheless, repairs were effected in time for the machine to be flown
to Travemunde later that month to participate in the fighter trials. In the meantime work was
progressing at Augsburg on further prototypes, and the Bf 109V2 (Werk Nr.809), registered D-IUDE,
was flown in January 1936, being transferred to Travemunde, via Rechlin,
on the 21st of that month. This prototype was fitted with the new Junken
Jumo 210A engine of 610 h.p. which drove a two-blade, fixed-pitch wooden
airscrew. Provision was made for the installation of two 7.9 mm. MG 17
machine-guns in the upper decking of the nose, this armament being
proposed for the Bf 109A production model.
The Bf 109V3 (Werke Nr.810),
registered D-IHNY, which followed in June 1936, was generally similar to
its predecessor, but it had meanwhile been decided by the German Air
Ministry that the armament of two MG 17 guns would be totally inadequate
in the light of intelligence reports on the unprecedented armament of
eight machine-guns proposed for installation in the Hurricane and Spitfire, and
the Bf 109A production model was abandoned in favour of the more heavily
armed Bf 109B, no A-series machines being completed. It was proposed
that the Bf 109B would initially carry three MG 17 machine-guns, two in
the top cowling and synchronized to fire through the airscrew, and the
other firing through the airscrew boss. The latter gun would eventually
be supplanted by a 20-mm. MG FF (Oerlikon) cannon which would endow the
fighter with a longer-ranging armament than that of either of its
British contemporaries.
The fourth prototype, the Bf 109V4, was initially
fitted with the trio of MG 17 guns but later conducted the first air
firing trials with the 20-mm. MG FF cannon. However, owing to cooling
difficulties, the cannon seized after firing a few shells, and it also
vibrated badly, so the Bf 109V5 and V6 were completed with the armament
of three machine-guns, as was also the production prototype, the Bf
109V7, which flew early in 1937. By this time preparations for quantity
production of the Bf 109B fighter had reached an advanced stage at
Augsburg, and deliveries of the pre-production Bf 109B-0 for service
evaluation were imminent. Flight testing of the prototype had not
progressed entirely smoothly.
The steep landing attitude disconcerted
service test pilots, and the fighter had a tendency to drop its port
wing just before touch-down. Wing flutter and tail buffeting were
experienced, the wing slots malfunctioned, the narrow-track
undercarriage failed frequently owing to weak attachment points, and the
aircraft tended to swing seriously during take-off and landing.
Nevertheless, despite the inauspicious commencement of its career,
Germany was determined to impress the world with the capabilities of the
reviving German aircraft industry, and from the beginning of 1936 the
press department of the German Air Ministry devoted much of its time to
eulogizing Germany’s “new wonder fighter”.
The fighter had first been seen in public when
Oberst Franke, the pilot who was later to be decorated for “sinking”
the Ark Royal in 1939, demonstrated the Bf 109Vl in 1936, during
the Olympic Games held in Berlin.
But by 1937 the foreign technical
press was becoming increasingly sceptical of the impressive claims made
for this fighter, which only a few privileged foreigners had seen.
Sensing this, Germany decided that a practical demonstration of the
fighter’s capabilities would do much to raise German aviation prestige.
Accordingly, it was decided to send a demonstration team equipped with
Bf 109 fighters to the International Flying Meeting held at Zurich in
July 1937. The team comprised two Bf 109B-ls, a Bf 109B-2, and the Bf
109V13. Led by Major Seidemann, who was later to command the
Fliegerkorps Afrika, the three Bf 109Bs won the contest for a circuit of
the Alps by military aeroplanes, covering the distance of 228 miles in
57 minutes 7 seconds at an average speed of
233.5 m.p.h. Oberst Franke won the Alpenflug in the Bf 109B-2, covering a circuit of 31.4 miles
four times at an average speed of 254.54 m.p.h. He also won the Alpine
circuit contest for single military aeroplanes in the Bf 109V13 at an
average speed of 241.3 m.p.h., and the dive-and-climb competition, in
which he reached 9,840 feet and returned to 1,060 feet in 2 minutes 5.7
seconds.
The Bf 109Vl3 was a standard B-series airframe adapted to take
the 960 h.p. Daimler-Benz DB 600 engine; and to further the considerable
prestige gained by the fighter at Zurich, a specially boosted DB 601
engine, delivering 1,650 h.p. for short periods, was fitted in this
prototype and the aircraft used by Dr. Hermann Wurster to raise the international speed record for landplanes to 319.39
m.p.h. on November 11, 1937.
Eighteen months later Germany was to adopt subterfuge in a successful
attempt to gain further acclaim for what was by then Germany’s
standard fighter. On Apri1 26, 1939, the world was informed that a
specially modified version of the Luftwaffe’s single-seat fighter had
raised the world air speed record to 469.22 m.p.h. However, the
so-called “Me 09R” record-breaking machine bore no relationship to the Bf 109 fighter other
than a common design team, for it was in fact the first prototype of an
entirely new design, built specifically for the record attempt and
fitted with a special engine giving 2,300 h.p. for short bursts.
During
the spring
of 1937 the small pre-production batch of Bf l09B-0 fighters was issued
to an experimental unit for service evaluation. This version was powered
by the 610 h.p. Jumo 210B engine, but the
first production model, the Bf 109B-1, which followed closely on
the heels of the pre-production machines, received the 635 h.p. Jumo
210D, with which it was supplied to the newly formed Richthofen
Jagdgeschwader.
The Bf 109B-1 attained 292 m.p.h. at 13,100 feet, and attained an
altitude of 19,685 feet in 9.8 minutes. Service ceiling was 26,575 feet,
and empty and loaded weights were 3,483 lb. and 4,850 lb., respectively.
The limitations of the fixed-pitch wooden airscrew necessitated its
early replacement by a two-blade variable-pitch metal airscrew, and a
licence to manufacture the Hamilton airscrew was acquired from the U.S.A.
This new airscrew was
fitted to the Bf 109B-2, the first production machines of this type
having the Jumo 210E engine with two-stage super-charger, but the
majority having the Jumo 2l0G of 670 h.p. By now the civil war was
raging in Spain, and the Polikarpov-designed I-15 (TsKB-3) and I-16
(TsKB-12) fighters supplied by Russia to the Republican forces
outperformed and outgunned the elderly Heinkel He 51 biplanes used by the Condor Legion which was supporting
General Franco and the Nationalists. In July 1937 the first and second
Staffeln of the Jagd Gruppe J/88 fighting in Spain were re-equipped with
some twenty-four Bf 109B fighters, the civil war presenting Germany with
an admirable opportunity to test her new fighter under operational conditions. It was here that the ill-founded legend of structural
weakness, a legend that was later fostered by Germany’s enemies and was
to cling to the fighter throughout its operational career, was first
started; an isolated incident of a damaged Bf 109B losing its tail in a
high-speed dive being exaggerated to such an extent that it was
popularly believed that this fighter would fall apart under high-stress
manoeuvres.
Although the Bf 109B was still prone to wing flutter and tail buffeting,
it proved highly successful. While largely used for bomber escort duties
and for occasional fighter sweeps over Republican airfields,
Oberstleutnant Harder built up a considerable score of
“kills” in his Bf 109B, and the machine proved to be an
effective weapon against the Russian fighters.
However, one major shortcoming was revealed: inadequate armament. The
three 7.9.-mm. MG 17 machine-guns provided insufficient rage and weight
of tie, and several B-mode1 airframes were fitted with a 20-mm. MG FF
cannon in place of the centrally-mounted MG 17. But this cannon was
unreliable and still prone to seizing after only a few shots had been
fired. This and severe vibration while firing prevented its widespread
use. At Augsburg extensive armament tests were undertaken.
The Bf 109V8 was fitted with two wing-mounted MG
17 machineguns, in addition to the two mounted in the engine cowling,
although these aggravated the flutter problem unti1 the ailerons were
balanced and the wing leading edge stiffened.
The next prototype, the Bf 109V9, had two 20-mm.
MG FF cannon installed in the wings. These machines served as prototypes
for the production C-series, which were essentially similar to the B-mode1 apart
from their armament.
The pre-production Bf 109C-0 and the initial
production Bf 109C-1 both carried four MG 17 machineguns, and the Bf
109C-2 subtype
had a further MG 17 firing through the airscrew hub.
The experimental Bf
109C-4 had four MG 17 guns and a single 20-mm. MG FF cannon, but this
version was not placed in service. In August 1938 twelve Bf 109C-1
fighters arrived in Spain to re-equip the third Staffel of J/88 which
was subsequently commanded by Werner Molders, who became the top-scoring
German fighter pilot in Spain.
While work was progressing on the improvement of the fighter’s armament,
parallel experiments were being conducted with a view to improving
performance. An early 960 h.p. Daimler-Benz DB 600 engine was installed
in a standard B-series airframe to form the Bf 109VlO. Two further
prototypes, the V11 and V12, were fitted with the production type DB
600A, resulting in a substantial, improvement in performance, a maximum
speed of 323 m.p.h. being attained, and service ceiling being boosted to
31,170 feet. With this engine a new sub-type, the Bf 109D, entered
production late in 1937, the pre-production Bf 109D-0 fighters employing
converted B-model airframes and carrying an MG 17 machinegun in each
wing as first introduced on the Bf 109C.
In addition, a single
engine-mounted MG FF cannon was carried. A small production batch of Bf 109D-1 fighters followed to equip
one Gruppe, but the availability of the redesigned DB 601 engine,
incorporating direct fuel injection and improved supercharging capacity,
had led to the abandonment of further production of the DB 600 and, in
consequence, the Bf 109D in favour of the Bf 109E with the later engine,
and ten of the Bf 109Ds were sold to Switzerland and three to Hungary.
The Bf 109E was the first true mass-production model of the basic design,
and by the end of 1939 it had replaced all previous models in first line
service with the Luftwaffe, and thirteen Gruppen, each of forty aircraft,
were operating with this type when the Second World War commenced. This
fighter was referred to throughout the war years as the “Me 109”,
but the contraction “Bf” far Bayerische Flugzeugwerke was the
prefix used for all versions of the 109 by officia1 German handbooks and
documents, including those produced after the company was reconstituted
as the Messerchmitt A.G.
The first true prototype for the E-series was
the Bf 109V14, which was powered by the 1,100 h.p. DB 601A engine and was
flown during the early summer of 1938. This carried an armament of two
wing-mounted MG FF cannon and two MG 17 machineguns in the engine cowling. The Bf 109V15 differed in having an engine-mounted MG FF cannon
and no wing guns. The pre-production Bf 109E-0 fighters appeared late in
1938, and both these and the initial Bf 109E-1 fighters carried an
armament of four MG 17 machine-guns as the MG FF cannon was still
considered to be inadequately developed for operational use. The Bf
109E-1 and E-l/B fighter-bomber, the later carrying four 50 kg. bombs or
one 250 kg. bomb, were standard equipment with the Luftwaffe by the time
Germany went to war, and by the end of 1939 production had been
transferred from the Augsburg factory to the new Regensburg plants (Regensburg-Priifening
and Regensburg-Obertraubling).
The Erla plant at Leipzig-Mockau, the Ago factory at Oschersleben, the Fieseler plant at
Kassel, the Arado factory at Warnemunde, and the W.N.F. factories at
Delitzsch and Wiener-Neustadt were being integrated in the
mass-production programme for this fighter, and a total of 1,540
machines had been produced. By standards appertaining at that time, the
Bf 109E was a very good fighter. It handled well and possessed excellent
low-speed control response and “feel”, although above 300 m.p.h. the
controls became extremely heavy, and the ailerons in particular became
almost immovable at around 400 m.p.h., making rolling virtually impossible. It lacked the
manoeuvrability of the Spitfire, nor did it possess the British
fighter’s turning circle, but its angle of climb was extremely good,
being developed at low airspeeds.
The Spitfire enjoyed a slight margin
in speed, but both the climb
rate and ceiling of the Bf 109E were superior, and the German fighter
was definitely the better above 20,000 feet. In a vertical dive the
Spitfire could not stay with the Bf 109E; but light though the rudder
was at low and medium speeds, the absence of a cockpit operated rudder
trim was a serious fault because the rudder became very heavy in a dive,
and then reversed trim, resulting in considerable pilot fatigue.
The direct injection pumps of the DB 601 engine had an advantage over the
carburettors of the Merlin, and the engine did not cut out or splutter
under negative “g”. The stall was gentle with no tendency to spin,
ample warning of its approach being given through aileron vibration and
tail buffeting.
With the slotted flaps lowered to 20°, the take-off run was remarkably
short and, the main wheels being positioned well forward of the centre
of gravity, fierce braking was permitted immediately on touch-down,
resulting in a short landing run and fast taxiing.
However, the tendency
to swing on take-off and landing, which had first manifested itself
during tests with the early prototypes, continued to plague the Bf 109E
and contributed substantially to the Luftwaffe’s high accident rate,
some 1,500 Bf 109 fighters being lost between the beginning of the war
and the autumn of 1941 in accidents caused by unintentional swings.
Only after the tailwheel had been fitted with a locking device, which
operated when the throttle was fully opened, did the tendency to swing
lessen. The Bf 109E1
carried two 7.9-mm. MG 17 machine-guns in the engine cowling and one MG
17 or 20-mm. MG FF cannon in each wing. With the latter guns installed the weight of fire was 290
lb./min. Empty and loaded weights were 4,360 lb. and 5,400 lb.,
respectively and, with a wing area of 174 sq. ft., the wing loading was
32.1 lb/sq. ft.
Overall dimensions included a span of 32 ft. 4 1/2 in.,
a length of 28 ft. 4 in., and a height of 7 ft. 5 1/2 in. with tail
down. Maximum speed was 354 m.p.h. at 12,300 feet, and at economica1
cruising speed (62.5 per cent rated power) and allowing for climbing at
full throttle to operating altitude after taking-off, the range was 412
miles at 16,400 feet. Initial climb rate was 3,100 ft./min., service
ceiling was 36,000 feet, and the absolute ceiling was 37,500 feet. The
Bf 109E-l/B fighter-bomber utilized the “Revi” gun-sight as a
bomb-sight, and the angle of dive for bombing was graphically shown by a
red line painted on either side of the cockpit canopy at 45° to the
horizon to enable the pilot to put the machine into the correct diving
angle. For high-altitude bombing the diving speed was 403 m.p.h., and
for bombing from a low altitude the recommended diving speed was 373
m.p.h.
The maximum permissible diving speed was 446 m.p.h. The main
sub-type of the E-series, the Bf 109E-3, entered production late in
1939. This model differed from its production predecessor in having
provision for one 20-mm. MG FF cannon firing through the airscrew boss,
in addition to the paired guns above the engine and in the wings.
However, the engine-mounted cannon was still unreliable and was seldom
used operationally. More Bf 109E-3 fighters were built than any other
model of the E-series, and by the beginning of 1940 the production rate
had attained some 150 machines per month, a total of 1,868 being
completed during 1940. Of these, 304 machines were exported to foreign
air force, including Bulgaria (19), Japan (2), Hungary (40), Rumania
(69), Slovakia (16), Switzerland (80), Russia (5), and Yugoslavia (73).
By the turn of the year the Bf 109E-4 had supplanted the E-3. This model
reverted to the twin engine-mounted MG 17 guns and pair of MG FF cannon,
but the latter were of an improved type.
The E-4/B was a fighter-bomber
variant. The year 1941 saw the introduction of numerous improvements:
the Bf 109E-VN was fitted with the 1,200 h.p. DB 601N engine which was
chiefly distinguished for its petrol injection system and the
automatically-controlled hydraulic coupling to the supercharger drive.
This version was later employed primarily in North Africa; the Bf 109E-5
was a special short-range reconnaissance model with reduced armament (two
MG 17) and a camera in place of the wireless, and the E-6 was similar
but employed the DB 601N
engine. The
Bf 109E/7 was normally a fighter equipped to carry an external
jettisonable tank, but some of this sub-series were later converted for
low-flying attack roles in North Africa, extra armour being bolted
beneath the engine and coolant radiators, and designated Bf 109E-7/ U2,
the suffix “U” indicating “modification”. The Bf 109E-7/Z was
fitted with a special bi-fuel “power boosting” system known as GM-1,
the E-8 was a further fighter variant in which all the progressive
improvements incorporated in earlier models became standard, and the
final sub-type of the E-series, the Bf 109E-9, was a reconnaissance
aircraft carrying an RB 50130 camera and a 66 Imperial gallons drop-tank.
In 1940, when work was progressing rapidly on
Germany’s first aircraft Carrier, the Graf Zeppelin, a shipboard
fighter variant of the Bf 109E-3 was produced by the Fieseler-Werke.
Known as the Bf 109T (the ”T” indicating “Trager” or “Carrier”),
this fighter possessed increased wing area, and spoilers fitted on the
wing upper surfaces at one-third chord to steepen the gliding angle and
reduce the landing run.
The outer wing panels were folded manually, and
an arrester hook was fitted. Only ten fighters of this type were
completed by Fieseler, and these were subsequently reconverted to
standard Bf 109E-3 configuration.
More extensive aerodynamic improvements made
necessary to take full advantage of the increased power available from
later Daimler-Benz engines were initiated in the spring of 1940. A
standard Bf 109 E airframe (Werke Nr.5604) was fitted with a 1,200 h.p.
DB 601E.1 engine housed in an entirely redesigned, symmetrical cowling.
The supercharger air intake was redesigned and positioned further out
from the engine cowling to increase the ram effect, the airscrew
spinner was enlarged, and the diameter of the airscrew reduced by some
six inches.
Shallower under wing radiators were fitted, incorporating
boundary layer bypasses, and the braced tail plane was replaced by a
cantilever structure. This experimental machine was flown for the first
time on July 10, 1940, at Augsburg-Haunstetten, and subsequently served
as the first prototype for the F-series fighters.
The Bf 109F embodied all the modifications
included on the experimental machine and also an extensively re-designed
wing which was tested on two further E-airframes. The new wing featured
rounded tips and slightly increased span.
The slotted ailerons were
replaced by Frise-type surfaces, and plain flaps of reduced area
replaced the slotted flaps that had been standard on all previous models.
In addition, a retractable tail wheel was fitted. The first
pre-production Bf 109F-0 fighters were delivered to Luftwaffe test
centres for evaluation late in 1940. These were powered by the DB 601N
engine which also powered the majority of the Bf 109F-1 production
batches, and an armament of two MG 17 machine-guns and one MG FF cannon
was carried.
The first Bf 109F1 fighters were delivered to
operational units in January 1941, but in February three early
production machines were lost in temporarily inexplicable circumstances.
In each case the pilot announced over the R/T that his engine was
vibrating violently, and immediately thereafter his aircraft dived out
of control, the pilot having no time to bail out. A few weeks later a
fourth accident occurred when the tail assembly of a Bf 109F-1 broke off
in midair.
Upon examination it was discovered that all the screws on the
tail assembly/fuselage joint had been torn out. This could only have
been caused by the tremendous vibrations for which the engine could not
be held responsible as it was found to have suffered damage only in the
crash. Suspicion then fell on the tail spar since the rivets between the
ribs and the elevators were all loose, missing or broken. Prolonged
investigations ascertained that when the bracing struts of the Bf 109E
tail assembly were omitted on the Bf 109F and stronger but less ribbing
used, the proportion of the rigidity to the strength of the member was
altered. The result was that the tailplane had a frequency of
oscillation which, at certain r.p.m., was overlapped by the engine, and
the resultant sympathetic vibrations tore out the tail spars.
Within a few months of the service debut of the
Bf 109F-1, in July 1941 a well-known German fighter pilot, Peter Pingel,
was forced down over Britain, his Bf 109F-1 being virtually intact. This
aircraft was subsequently repaired, enabling British test pilots to
ascertain its handing characteristics and performance.
The Bf 109F-2 differed from the initial
production model in having the engine-mounted MG FF replaced by a 15-mm.
MG 151 which substantially increased firepower because of its higher
velocity and better trajectory. However, there were conflicting opinions
among the leading German fighter pilots concerning the armament of the
Bf 109F. Adolf Galland considered the reduced number of guns to be a
retrogressive step, while Werner Molders favoured this light armament.
Later, the Bf 109F4/Rl was to appear with a 20-mm. MG 151 cannon
mounted in a gondola under each wing; but while this improved the
fighter’s effectiveness as a bomber destroyer, it adversely affected
the machine’s powers of manoeuvre and reduced its potency in
fighter-versus-fighter combat.
The Bf 109F2/Z had GM-l power-boosting equipment, and the F-2/Trop was a
tropicalized version for use in North Africa. Both the F-l and F-2
production models were intended to have the DB 601E engine of 1,300 h.p.,
but delivery delays had necessitated the installation of the DB 60lN,
and it was not until the Bf 109F.3 appeared on the production lines
early in 1942 that the DB
60lE war installed. With this engine the Bf 109F.3 could attain a
maximum speed of 390 m.p.h. at 22,000 feet. Normal cruising range was
440 miles at 310 m.p.h. at 16,500 feet, and service ceiling was 37,000 feet. Empty and loaded weights were 4,330 lb. and 6,054 lb.
respectively, and wing loading had risen to 34.8 lb./sq. ft. The Bf
109F-4 had the engine-mounted 15-mm. MG 151 cannon replaced by a 20-mm.
MG 151, and the F-4/B and F-4/Trop were fighter bomber and tropicalized
versions respectively.
The Bf 109F-4/Rl could have a GM-I power boosting
system in place of the additional 20-mm. cannon under wing, and
it was intended to fit four RZ 65 air-to-air or air-to-ground rocket
missile on under-wing racks, but this armament was never perfected for
operational use. The Bf 109F-5 was used primarily for long-range
reconnaissance duties, carrying a 66 Imperial gallon drop-tank, and the
F-6 was another reconnaissance variant which, generally unarmed, had an
RB 5O/30, RB 20/30 or RB 75/30 camera in place of the radio.
Several F-series airframes were utilized for experimental purposes. One
Bf 109F-1 was fitted with boundary layer fences for comparison purposes
with the leading-edge slots; one was fitted with an elongated wing for
high-altitude trials, another had a vee-type or “butterfly” tail
assembly, two others had single and twin nose wheels, while
yet another had the DB 601N engine replaced by a BMW 801 radial for
comparison with the Fw 190. The later experiment was unsuccessful as the
slim fuselage married to the bulky engine resulted in extreme turbulence
in the area of the tail assembly.
Another interesting experiment was
the Bf 109Z, the marriage of two standard Bf 109F-1 fuselages and port
and starboard wings with a new centre wing section and tail plane which
joined the two fuselages to form “Siamese twins”. This was built to
test the possibilities of the proposed Me 609, but the prototype was
never flown.
A total of 2.628 Bf 109E and F fighters was produced in 1941, and of this
total some 60 per cent was produced by the Erla plant at Leipzig-Mockau
(683) and the W.N.F. factories at Delitzsch and Wiener-Neustadt (836).
During the spring and summer of 1942 the assembly lines began to switch
to the production of the Bf 109G, deliveries of which commenced in the
late summer of 1942 and which was appearing on all war fronts by the end
of that year. With the phasing out of the F-series, the basic Bf 109
design might be considered to have passed the peak of its development,
for with the introduction of the G-series the constant operational
demands for increased fire power and additional equipment brought with
them a serious deterioration in the fighter’s flying characteristics.
The
Bf 109G could not be flown in a landing circuit with Raps and
undercarriage down other than at full throttle, and experienced German
operational pilots have described its landing characteristics as “malicious”.
Nevertheless, some 70 per cent of all the Bf 109 fighters produced
during the war years were of the G-series. The most important change
denoted by the introduction of the Bf l09G was the installation of the
more powerful DB 605A engine in which the cylinder block had been
redesigned to obtain the maximum possible bore with the existing
cylinder centres, the permissible r.p.m. increased, and numerous other
changes made in comparison with the DB 601.
These changes resulted in an
output of 1,475 h.p. at 2,800 r.p.m. at sea level, and 1,355 h.p. at
18,700 feet. However, this engine was not available for installation in
the twelve pre-production Bf 109G-0 fighters which retained the DB 601E
engine of the preceding production model. The Bf 109G-0 was fitted with
a pressurized cockpit, a feature which was becoming increasingly
necessary in view of the altitudes to which air combat had by that time
risen, and this was also fitted in the first production model, the Bf l09G-1, which was powered by the DB 605A-l
engine with GM 1 power boost.
The Bf 109G-1, which was dubbed “Gustav” by its pilots, carried a
single engine-mounted 20-mm. MG 151 cannon and two MG 17 machineguns
mounted over the engine. The latter 7.9-mm. guns were replaced by 13-mm.
MG 131 machine-guns in the tropicalized Bf 109Gl/Trop, the installation
necessitating the provision of fairings over the gun breeches.
The
G-2 was generally similar but had no pressure cabin. It was used
primarily in the fighter-reconnaissance role, and the service test group
at Guyan-court, France, experimented with a ventral gun pack in which
two rear-firing MG 17 machineguns were fitted. The G-3 was similar to
the G-1 but fitted with FuG 16Z radio in place of the earlier FuG7A,
while the G-4 was an unpressurized version of the G-3. The Bf 109G-5
received the DB 605D engine which had a supercharger of increased
diameter and a methanol/water injection system. The two agents were
contained in a jettisonable tank under the fuselage and fed to the
engine in times of emergency.
When injected into the cylinders with the 100-octane fuel, the methanol
and water increased the amount of combustible mixture per unit volume of
the cylinder, the increase in thermal efficiency temporarily boosting
power to 1,800 h.p. at sea-level. The G-5/R2 was fitted with a taller
fin and rudder assembly and lengthened tail wheel leg in a fresh attempt
to cure the swerve which still characterized takeoff and landing. The
new tail assembly was made of wood in an attempt to conserve light
metals. The Bf 109G-6, which could be fitted with several alternative
versions of the DB 605, carried a 30-mm. MK 108 cannon firing through
the airscrew boss, two 13-mm. MG 131 machine-guns above the engine, and
two 20-mm. MG 151 cannon in under wing gondola.
The MK 108 used
explosive ammunition, and its muzzle velocity was only 1,760 ft./ min.,
but it proved to be an effective anti-bomber weapon. In the G-6/U4
version the MG 151 cannon were replaced by two MK 108s. The Bf
109G-6/U4N was an improvised night fighter to use “Wilde Sau”
tactics. This variant was fitted with “Naxos Z” warning and homing
receivers with a range of thirty miles. The rotating antenna was
installed aft of the cockpit, but the radar scope merely indicated
direction and not distance. Two Staffeln were equipped with this
improvised night-fighter and operated briefly in the Cologne area, but
the majority of these
machines were destroyed in landing accidents owing to the inadequate
night-flying experience of their pilots. The Bf 109G-6/Rl was a
fighter-bomber conversion of the basic sub-type, and the G-6/R2 carried
two WG 21 rocket tubes in place of the under-wing gun gondola.
The WG 21
missiles were of 21-cm. calibre, and fighters so equipped were mostly
used by the J.G.I. and J.G.26 “Schlageter” units, but the missiles
reduced maximum speed by some 25 m.p.h. and disrupted the airflow over
the elevators, and only limited success was attained. The Bf 109G-7 was
a proposed version in which all the successive modifications to the G-6
version became standard, but this type did not enter production. The G-8
reverted to the old tail assembly and was a fast reconnaissance model
fitted with an RB 12.5/7 or RB 32/7 camera. The engine-mounted MK 108
was removed.
The fastest sub-type of the G-series was the Bf l09G-10
which, powered by the DB 605D engine and aided by GM 1, attained 428 mph.
at 24,250 feet. Climb to 20.000 feet was effected in 6 minutes, and
range was 350 miles. No wing guns were carried, and the engine-mounted
MK 108 was optional. The Bf 109G-10/U4 carried two additional MK 108
cannon with eighty rounds per gun in a belly tray, but this was
subsequently replaced by a non-jettisonable long-range tank known as the
“Immer-Behalterer”.
The G-10/R2 and R6 received the new tail assembly, the elongated tail
wheel leg, FuG 25a equipment for friend-foe identification, and a
modified cockpit canopy known as the “Galland hood”. Several Bf
109G-1 airframes had an additional seat installed and were redesignated
Bf 109G-12 operational trainers. The pupil and instructor were seated in
tandem, and the side windows of the rear cockpit were bulged in order to
improve the instructor’s view.
The last of all the G-series fighters to attain operational status was
the Bf 109G-14. This model was generally similar to the G-6 and could be
fitted with the DB 605A, AM, AS, ASB, ASM or D engine, and armament
comprised two MG 131 machine-guns and one 20 mm. MG 151 in the fuselage,
and provision was made for the fitting of two MG 151 cannon under wing.
One 250 kg. bomb or two WG 21 rockets could be carried, and the
“Galland hood” was standard. The G-14/Trop was a tropicalized
version, and the G-14/R2 received the new wooden tail unit first fitted
to the G-5/R2 but retained the short tail-wheel leg. The final
production G-series aircraft, the Bf 109G16, did not reach operations.
It was generally similar to the G-14 but retained the old-type cockpit
hood, and was heavily armoured for the close support role.
Despite the advent of the very much superior Focke-Wulf Fw 190 fighter,
production of the now elderly Bf 109 was progressively increased. Total
production for 1942 amounted to 2,664 machines. This total was not very
much greater than that for the previous year, a fact accounted for by
the phasing out of the Bf 109F in favour of the G-series and the
retooling of the Ago factory at Oschersleben, the Fieseler factory at
Kassel, and the Arado factory at Warnemunde for other aircraft types,
but in
1943
production rose to 6,418 aircraft. In that year the Industria
Aeronautica Romana (I.A.R.) factory at Brasov, in Rumania, the Hungarian
Waggonwerke D.F.A.G. at Budapest, and a Messerschmitt controlled plant
at Gyor in Hungary had completed retooling and commenced deliveries of
the Bf 109G.
Although the various complexes of factories controlled by
the Messerschmitt A.G. were increasingly heavily bombed in 1944,
production figures still increased in leaps and bounds, the
unprecedented total of 14,212 machines being delivered in that year. Of
these, 6,318 were produced by Messerschmitt’s Regensburg factories
which reached their production peak in October 1944 with the delivery of 755
aircraft. Small numbers of Bf 109G fighters were exported in 1943-44,
this type being delivered to the air force of Bulgaria (145), Finland
(70), Japan (21), Rumania (70), Slovakia (15), Spain (25) and Hungary
(59). Surprisingly, in the few months of 1945, before Germany’s
collapse, when communications had been disrupted and few factories above
the surface of the ground were intact, the German aircraft industry
still succeeded in producing 2,969 Bf 109 fighters, of which 1,074 were
produced at Regensburg. In 1943, development of a specialized
high-altitude version of the basic Bf 109F/G series was commenced.
A small number of pre-production aircraft,
designated Bf 109H-0, were converted from standard Bf 109F airframes by the insertion of additional wing sections
which increased span by 6 ft. 6 in. and the attachment of a new,
long-span tailplane which was reinforced by stout struts. The Bf 109H-0
was powered by the DB 601E engine, but the production Bf l09H-1 had the
DB 605A with GM-1 boost and was used in the summer of 1944 by the service
test group at Guyan-court. Intended for fighter-reconnaissance duties,
the Bf l09H-1 was able to reach an altitude of approximately 47,000
feet, and attained a maximum speed of 466 m.p.h. Armament comprised two
7.9-mm. MG 17 machine-guns and one 30-mm. MK 108, and it was proposed to
insta11 two 13-mm. MG 131 guns in the wings. However, the long-span wing
fluttered severely in dives, and further development was abandoned in
favour of the Focke-Wulf Ta 152H. At one time several developments of the
basic type were proposed, including the Bf 109H-2 which was to have had
a Jumo 213E “power egg” and pressure cabin, and the Bf 109H-5 with
the DB 605L engine.
In the early autumn of 1944 the first aircraft
of the K-series made their appearance with service test groups. The
pre-production machines were designated Bf 109K-0 and were essentially
similar to the Bf 109G but incorporated minor structural differences and
standardized on the DB 605D engine with MW 50 power boost. Three
sub-types were produced, the Bf 109K-4 and K-6, powered by the DB
605ASCM/DCM, and the K-14 powered by DB 605L. The Bf109K-4 carried an
armament of two 15-mm. MG 151 guns over the engine and one
engine-mounted MK 108 or MK 103. A pressure cabin was fitted and the
“Galland hood” was adopted as standard. Maximum speed at sea-leve1
was 377 m.p.h., and at 19,685 feet was 452 m.p.h. Service ceiling was
41,000 feet, and climb to 16,400 feet took 3 minutes, and to 32,800 feet
took 6.7 minutes. Range at a loaded weight of 6,834 lb. was 356 miles,
and maximum take-off weight was 7,400 lb. The Bf 109K-6 differed
primarily in its armament which comprised two 13-mm. MG 131 guns over
the engine, an engine-mounted 30-mm, MK 108 or MK 103, and two MK 103
cannon under-slung on the wing. Maximum take-off weight was 7,920 lb.,
and maximum speed was 440 m.p.h. at 19,700 feet. The Bf 109K-14 carried
two MG 131 and one MK 108, and attained 455 m.p.h. at 37,750 feet. The
two earlier versions were entering service at the end of the war, but
the Bf l09K-14 had not attained operational status.
The Bf 109L was basically a G-series airframe in
which the fuselage section had been increased to merge with a Junkers
Jumo 213E “power egg”. The wing span was increased to 43 ft. 9 in.
and the area to 236 sq. it. Theoretical maximum speed was 476 m.p.h. at
35,000 feet, hut development was never completed. Another version under
development at the end of the war was the Bf 109S. This development was
being undertaken by Caudron-Renault in Paris, and a prototype, the Bf
109V24, was tested in the Chalais-Meudon wind tunnel. The Bf 109s was to
have incorporated a system of air discharge over the wing to improve
control at low forward speeds, and was nearing completion at the time of
France’s liberation.
The Messerschmitt Bf 109 was a standard Luftwaffe
single-seat fighter for nearly a decade. No exact figures are available
for the tota1 number of fighters of this type produced, but it is
believed that more than 33,000 were built between 1936 and the end of
the Second World War, representing more than sixty per cent of al1 the
single-engined fighters produced by Germany during that period.
Manufacture of the Bf 109 continued in Czechoslovakia and Spain after
World War II, endowing Professor Messerschmitt’s fighter with a record
for production longevity. Having fought on every front upon which the
Luftwaffe was engaged, and having been produced in water numbers than
any other combat type, the Messerschmitt Bf 109 probably ranks second
only to the Supermarine Spitfire as one of the true “immortals” of
the Second World War.